William Katz:  Urgent Agenda

HOME      ABOUT      OUR ARCHIVE      CONTACT 

 

 

 

 

STRANGENESS IN IRAN – The Iranians are doing strange things with their uranium, and no one can figure out why.  The New York Times's excellent David Sanger has the story:

WASHINGTON — When Iran was caught last September building a secret, underground nuclear enrichment plant at a military base near the city of Qum, the country’s leaders insisted they had no other choice. With its nuclear facilities under constant threat of attack, they said, only a fool would leave them out in the open.

So imagine the surprise of international inspectors almost two weeks ago when they watched as Iran moved nearly its entire stockpile of low-enriched nuclear fuel to an above-ground plant. It was as if, one official noted, a bull’s-eye had been painted on it.

Why take such a huge risk?

That mystery is the subject of fervent debate among many who are trying to decode Iran’s intentions. The theories run from the bizarre to the mundane: Under one, Iran is actually taunting the Israelis to strike first. Under another, it is simply escalating the confrontation with the West to win further concessions in negotiations that have dragged on for months. The simplest explanation is that Iran has run short of suitable storage containers for radioactive fuel, so it had to move everything.

The debate reflects the depth of confusion about the intentions of a badly divided Iranian leadership. Since October, when Iran agreed in principle to ship much of its nuclear stockpile out of the country so that it could be converted to fuel for a medical reactor, there have been a series of unexplained actions.

COMMENT:  Historically, the Iranians are excellent negotiators, stemming from the Persian tradition.  This is pure speculation, but this movement of uranium can be some kind of negotiating ploy, the nature of which is still to be seen.

One thing is clear:  So far, Iran has beaten us badly in the negotiating game.  They've given up nothing, and gotten everything.  Mr. Obama, who fancies himself a man of brilliance and an international actor of high tone, seems unable to do a thing about it. 

February 26, 2010